Politics and Morality essays

Politics and Morality essays Politics and Morality: Is There Enough Room for Both? Politics and morals are two of the most confusing terms that our world has to define. There are so many lingering questions about the two terms; especially when the idea of the terms being used together arises. Is it possible to have a system that uses both? Or from a different light, is it possible to have a system that does not use both? I would argue that morality plays an enormous role in politics and is the major principle that divides our world up into states. In the modern world it is impossible to have system that does not define itself with morals. Each state arranges a way of ruling itself, however, that rule is created by the many social collectivities that make up a state. Some of these nations share identities or origins or a list of other likenesses, however they all share some sort of commonness. That shared part of their lives helps them to create morals which in turn that nation uses to help define the rule for the state. If all states are based on morality, though, what is stopping one state from attacking another because it has violated some of its morals? Our world would be a constant battlefield if states where attacking states over moral righteousness. So how is a state to decide whether or not to go to war over an issue? And is it right for a state A to intervene in state Bs conflict based on state As morals? Questions such as these were some of the reasons that international bodies such as the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization were founded. These bodies were to bring states together to come to a consensus on issues so that they would be resolved in a way that was best for the world as a whole. From a different light one might ask who is to make sure that the states are acting in a way that is best for the world and not forming alliances to get what is best for their state? And that reason alo...

Apartheid Era Blacks Act No 67 of 1952

Apartheid Era Blacks Act No 67 of 1952 Definition: The Blacks (Abolition of Passes and Co-ordination of Documents) Act No 67 of 1952 (commenced 11 July) repealed early laws, which differed from province to province, relating to the carrying of passes by Black male workers (e.g. the Native Labour Regulation Act of 1911) and instead required all black persons over the age of 16 in all provinces to carry a reference book at all times. They were required by law to produce the book when requested by any member of the police or by an administrative official. The pass included a photograph, carried details of place of origin, employment record, tax payments, and encounters with the police. A special court system was devised to enforce the pass law – people appearing at such commissioners courts were considered guilty until they had proven their innocence. During the 60s, 70s and 80s around 500,000 Blacks were arrested each year, their cases tried (mainly uncontested), and in the 60s fined or sentenced to a short prison term. From the early 70s the convicted were deported to Bantustans instead (under the Admission of Persons to the Republic regulation Act No 59 of 1972). By the mid 80s, by which time almost 20 million people had been arrested (and tried, fined, imprisoned, or deported), the pass law had become increasingly difficult to enforce and it was abandoned. Repealed by the Identification Act No 72 of 1986. Also Known As: Natives (Abolition of Passes and Co-ordination of Documents) Act No 67 of 1952